Synopsis - Issue Tracker

Hartmut Kaiser via synopsis issue tracker wrote:
> Hartmut Kaiser <hkaiser@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> 
> All I can say is, that Wave produces XY as well, which makes me believe that this is correct ;-)

uhm, the ucpp author claims that according to the standard (which I'm
not familiar with) this is undefined territory.
The fact that gcc as well as wave both interpret the standard the same
way as the author of the boost preprocessor library is of practical
value, but doesn't make the macro correct. ;-)

Hartmut, do you have any plans for helping me write the wave backend
for synopsis ? As wave was just accepted to be part of boost, you
are probably going to integrate the code into boost mainline if you
haven't done so already. Any chance we could use wave as an (optional)
Cpp backend in synopsis ? That would nicely solve this bug :-)